Ancil Adkins v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare

Sixth Circuit

Ancil Adkins v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare

330 F.2d 704, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5653

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 17, 1964·No. 15485_1·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

ORDER AFFIRMING JUDGMENT OF DISTRICT COURT.

Appellant filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky to review a final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare denying appellant’s claim for total and permanent disability benefits under the Social Security Act. The District Court sustained appellee’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint, and appellant has appealed to this Court.

The hearing examiner had denied appellant’s application for benefits and his decision, when the Appeals Council overruled the request for review, became the final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare.

Upon consideration, we are of the opinion that the findings of the Secretary are supported by substantial evidence and therefore are conclusive. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Ward v. Ribicoff, 198 F.Supp. 15 (E.D.Tenn.), aff’d, 309 F.2d 157 (C.A.6).

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER AFFIRMING JUDGMENT OF DISTRICT COURT.

Appellant filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky to review a final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare denying appellant’s claim for total and permanent disability benefits under the Social Security Act. The District Court sustained appellee’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint, and appellant has appealed to this Court.

The hearing examiner had denied appellant’s application for benefits and his decision, when the Appeals Council overruled the request for review, became the final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare.

Upon consideration, we are of the opinion that the findings of the Secretary are supported by substantial evidence and therefore are conclusive. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Ward v. Ribicoff, 198 F.Supp. 15 (E.D.Tenn.), aff’d, 309 F.2d 157 (C.A.6).

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Ancil Adkins v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, 330 F.2d 704, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5653 (6th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

330 F.2d 704 (Ancil Adkins v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related