Anchor Sign Co. of Georgia, Inc. v. LaBarge Pipe & Steel Co.

192 S.E.2d 714, 127 Ga. App. 86, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 795
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 22, 1972·No. 47348·Published

Opinion

Eberhardt, Presiding Judge.

1. "No questions are raised as to portions of the charge where there is no reference in the enumerations or in the brief as to portions of the record indicating that the objections were made prior to verdict and what the objections may have been.” Matthews v. Tucker Real Estate Co., 116 Ga. App. 214 (3) (156 SE2d 669). Accord: Johnson v. Myers, 118 Ga. App. 773 (2b) (165 SE2d 739, 33 ALR3d 1047). The record does not disclose any such objections, and it does not appear that there was error harmful as a matter of law within the purview of Code Ann. § 70-207 (c).

2. The general grounds of the motion for new trial are without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen and Clark, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anchor Sign Co. of Georgia, Inc. v. LaBarge Pipe & Steel Co., 192 S.E.2d 714, 127 Ga. App. 86, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 795 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972).

192 S.E.2d 714 (Anchor Sign Co. of Georgia, Inc. v. LaBarge Pipe & Steel Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Myers
165 S.E.2d 739 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)
Matthews v. TUCKER REAL ESTATE COMPANY, INC.
156 S.E.2d 669 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)