Home/Supreme Court/Anchor Co. v. P. & M. Co.

Anchor Co. v. P. & M. Co.

258 U.S. 605, 42 S. Ct. 313, 66 L. Ed. 786, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2308
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 13, 1922
DocketNo. 161
StatusPublished

This text of 258 U.S. 605 (Anchor Co. v. P. & M. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anchor Co. v. P. & M. Co., 258 U.S. 605, 42 S. Ct. 313, 66 L. Ed. 786, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2308 (1922).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Affirmed upon the authority of Tyler Co. v. Ludlow-Saylor Wire Co., 236 U. S. 723; Chicago Car Heating Co. v. Gold Car [606]*606Heating & Lighting Co., 245 U. S. 631.

Mr. Edwin B. H. Tower, Jr., with whom Mr. Melville Church, and Mr. Wylie C. Margeson were on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Otto R. Barnett for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

W. S. Tyler Co. v. Ludlow-Saylor Wire Co.
236 U.S. 723 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Chicago Car Heating Co. v. Gold Car Heating & Lighting Co.
245 U.S. 631 (Supreme Court, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
258 U.S. 605, 42 S. Ct. 313, 66 L. Ed. 786, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anchor-co-v-p-m-co-scotus-1922.