Anaya v. State

292 S.W.2d 108, 1956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1576
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 30, 1956·No. No. 28444·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

DICE, Commissioner.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of a narcotic drug, to wit: marijuana1'; the punishment,' 3 years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

(1) The statement of facts appearing in the record is not shown to have been filed ■ with the clerk of the trial court as required by art. 759a, § 4, Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P., and therefore cannot be considered. Riley v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 264 S.W.2d 437.

(2) There are no bills bf exception, and the proceedings appear to be regular; therefore, nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Anaya v. State, 292 S.W.2d 108, 1956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1576 (Tex. 1956).

292 S.W.2d 108 (Anaya v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Timmons v. State
586 S.W.2d 509 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1979)
Greer v. State
306 S.W.2d 371 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1957)