Anaya v. State
This text of 292 S.W.2d 108 (Anaya v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The conviction is for the unlawful possession of a narcotic drug, to wit: marijuana1'; the punishment,' 3 years’ confinement in the penitentiary.
(1) The statement of facts appearing in the record is not shown to have been filed ■ with the clerk of the trial court as required by art. 759a, § 4, Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P., and therefore cannot be considered. Riley v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 264 S.W.2d 437.
(2) There are no bills bf exception, and the proceedings appear to be regular; therefore, nothing is presented for review.
The judgment is affirmed.
Opinion approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
292 S.W.2d 108, 1956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anaya-v-state-texcrimapp-1956.