Anastasia Nays and Charles Nunley, Jr. v. Pradeep Kumar Singh

Opinion

In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-24-00288-CV

___________________________

ANASTASIA NAYS AND CHARLES NUNLEY, JR., Appellants V.

PRADEEP KUMAR SINGH, Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2024-003498-1

Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT Appellants’ brief was due on October 24, 2024. On November 5, 2024, we notified appellants that their brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require.1 See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, on or before November 15, 2024, appellants filed with the court an appellants’ brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.

Because appellants have failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: December 5, 2024

1 In other correspondence with appellants, we notified them that their docketing statement had not been filed and directed them to file a docketing statement. See Tex. R. App. P. 32.1. Despite that correspondence, appellants have not filed a docketing statement.