Anastacio v. Haug
This text of 295 A.D.2d 294 (Anastacio v. Haug) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.), dated December 18, 2000, as denied their motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability on their cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
There are triable issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. Altman, J.P., Schmidt, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
295 A.D.2d 294, 742 N.Y.S.2d 900, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anastacio-v-haug-nyappdiv-2002.