Anania v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Anania v. State

22 A.D.2d 756, 253 N.Y.S.2d 687, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2902

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 29, 1964

DocketClaim No. 37299

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.2d 756 (Anania v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anania v. State, 22 A.D.2d 756, 253 N.Y.S.2d 687, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and facts [757]*757by increasing the award to $15,500, with interest, and as modified affirmed, with costs to claimant. Certain finding of fact and conclusion of law modified. Memorandum: In determining valuation the trial court failed to give sufficient weight to the added value of the property by reason of its proximity to Seneca Lake. While the comparable sales submitted by the State were helpful as a basis for the award, none of them had this beneficial factor. (Appeal from judgment of Court of Claims for claimant on a claim for permanent appropriation of realty.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Noonan and Del Vecchio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and facts [757]*757by increasing the award to $15,500, with interest, and as modified affirmed, with costs to claimant. Certain finding of fact and conclusion of law modified. Memorandum: In determining valuation the trial court failed to give sufficient weight to the added value of the property by reason of its proximity to Seneca Lake. While the comparable sales submitted by the State were helpful as a basis for the award, none of them had this beneficial factor. (Appeal from judgment of Court of Claims for claimant on a claim for permanent appropriation of realty.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Noonan and Del Vecchio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.2d 756, 253 N.Y.S.2d 687, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anania-v-state-nyappdiv-1964.