Anak Wine & Liquor Co. v. New York Liqour Authority
This text of 243 N.E.2d 757 (Anak Wine & Liquor Co. v. New York Liqour Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Bergan, Breitel and Jasen. Judges Scileppi and Keating dissent and vote to reverse and to reinstate the order and judgment of [712]*712Special Term upon the ground that the finding of the State Liquor Authority that the public convenience and advantage will be served by the granting of another retail liquor store license in this dilapidated, poverty stricken, disease and crime-ridden neighborhood is without support in the record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
243 N.E.2d 757, 23 N.Y.2d 710, 296 N.Y.S.2d 154, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anak-wine-liquor-co-v-new-york-liqour-authority-ny-1968.