Anahi Ramirez Domingues v. Gerardo Alvarado

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 13, 2025
Docket01-24-00744-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Anahi Ramirez Domingues v. Gerardo Alvarado (Anahi Ramirez Domingues v. Gerardo Alvarado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anahi Ramirez Domingues v. Gerardo Alvarado, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Opinion issued February 13, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00744-CV ——————————— ANAHI RAMIREZ DOMINGUEZ, Appellant V. GERARDO ALVARADO ZAVALA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 311th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2024-18618

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Anahi Ramirez Dominguez, has filed a notice of appeal from the

trial court’s August 29, 2024 final judgment. Appellant has failed to timely file a

brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief). The clerk’s record was filed in this appeal on October 28, 2024, and the

reporter’s record was filed on November 4, 2024. Appellant’s brief was due to be

filed on or before December 5, 2024. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Appellant did not

file an appellant’s brief.

On December 16, 2024, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that this

appeal was subject to dismissal unless a brief, or a motion to extend time to file a

brief, was filed within ten days of the notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a) (governing

failure of appellant to file brief), 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of appeal

for want of prosecution), 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case for failure

to comply with notice from Clerk of Court). Despite the notice that this appeal was

subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond to the December 16, 2024

notice.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Caughey, and Morgan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Anahi Ramirez Domingues v. Gerardo Alvarado, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anahi-ramirez-domingues-v-gerardo-alvarado-texapp-2025.