Anaconda Co. v. City of Perth Amboy
404 A.2d 1155, 81 N.J. 55, 1979 N.J. LEXIS 1492
Opinion
ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted limited to the issue as to whether processing tanks and related machinery and equipment are or are not business personal property, taxable under N.J.S.A. 54:11A-1, et seq.
As to this issue, the judgment of the Appellate Division is vacated and the case is remanded to the Division of Tax Appeals for further consideration in light of City of Bayonne v. Port Jersey Corporation, 79 N.J. 367 (1979). (See 157 N.J.Super. 42)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Anaconda Co. v. City of Perth Amboy, 404 A.2d 1155, 81 N.J. 55, 1979 N.J. LEXIS 1492 (N.J. 1979).
404 A.2d 1155 (Anaconda Co. v. City of Perth Amboy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Coastal Eagle Point Oil Co. v. West Deptford Township
13 N.J. Tax 242 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1993)
Inwood at Great Notch v. Township of Little Falls
6 N.J. Tax 316 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1984)
Diament v. Borough of Fort Lee
3 N.J. Tax 70 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1981)
Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada v. City of Orange
2 N.J. Tax 25 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1980)