Ana Molina-Barahona v. William Barr

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 3, 2020
Docket20-1171
StatusUnpublished

This text of Ana Molina-Barahona v. William Barr (Ana Molina-Barahona v. William Barr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ana Molina-Barahona v. William Barr, (4th Cir. 2020).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1171

ANA CELI MOLINA-BARAHONA,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: November 17, 2020 Decided: December 3, 2020

Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charlie E. Carrillo, CARRILLO & CARRILLO, LLC, Frederick, Maryland, for Petitioner. Ethan P. Davis, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Holly M. Smith, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jesse D. Lorenz, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ana Celi Molina-Barahona, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review

of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reconsider.

We have thoroughly reviewed the administrative record and Molina-Barahona’s claims and

conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(a), (b) (2020); Narine v. Holder, 559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th Cir. 2009); Jean v.

Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review

for the reasons stated by the Board. In re Molina-Barahona (B.I.A. Jan. 16, 2020). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Narine v. Holder
559 F.3d 246 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ana Molina-Barahona v. William Barr, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ana-molina-barahona-v-william-barr-ca4-2020.