Ana Mendez v. Loretta E. Lynch

648 F. App'x 645
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 18, 2016
Docket13-70508
StatusUnpublished

This text of 648 F. App'x 645 (Ana Mendez v. Loretta E. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ana Mendez v. Loretta E. Lynch, 648 F. App'x 645 (9th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ana Bertha Mendez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to remand and dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision terminating her removal proceedings. We dismiss the petition for review.

*646 Because an order terminating removal proceedings is not a final order of removal, we lack jurisdiction to consider Mendez’s petition for review. See Alcala v. Holder, 563 F.3d 1009, 1013-16 (9th Cir.2009); see also 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(9) (“Judicial review of all questions of law and fact ... shall be available only in judicial review of a final order [of removal].”).

In light of this disposition, we do not reach Mendez’s request for remand to apply for relief from removal.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alcala v. Holder
563 F.3d 1009 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
648 F. App'x 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ana-mendez-v-loretta-e-lynch-ca9-2016.