Ana Martinez Hernandez v. Merrick Garland

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 1, 2023
Docket22-2033
StatusUnpublished

This text of Ana Martinez Hernandez v. Merrick Garland (Ana Martinez Hernandez v. Merrick Garland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ana Martinez Hernandez v. Merrick Garland, (4th Cir. 2023).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2033 Doc: 26 Filed: 06/01/2023 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-2033

ANA Y MARTINEZ HERNANDEZ

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: April 20, 2023 Decided: June 1, 2023

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Robert J. Harris, Woodbridge, Virginia, for Petitioner. Brian M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Daniel E. Goldman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Robbin K. Blaya, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-2033 Doc: 26 Filed: 06/01/2023 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Ana Martinez Hernandez (Martinez), a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions

for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to

reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and Martinez’s claims and find

no abuse of discretion. See Narine v. Holder, 559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th Cir. 2009); Jean v.

Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review

for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Martinez Hernandez (B.I.A. Sept. 1, 2022).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Narine v. Holder
559 F.3d 246 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ana Martinez Hernandez v. Merrick Garland, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ana-martinez-hernandez-v-merrick-garland-ca4-2023.