Ana Mahu v. Eric Holder, Jr.

543 F. App'x 315
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 21, 2013·No. 13-1503·Unpublished

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ana Mahu, a native and citizen of Moldova, and Denis Igorevich Zernyukov, a native and citizen of Russia, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying their motion to reopen. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including Zernyu-kov’s affidavit and his documentary evidence and conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative findings of fact, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2006), and that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2013); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir.2009).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Mahu (B.I.A. Apr. 9, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ana Mahu v. Eric Holder, Jr., 543 F. App'x 315 (4th Cir. 2013).

543 F. App'x 315 (Ana Mahu v. Eric Holder, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Doherty
502 U.S. 314 (Supreme Court, 1992)
Mosere v. Mukasey
552 F.3d 397 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)