Ana Link, Ltd. v. Mega U.S.A., Inc.

90 A.D.3d 472, 933 N.Y.2d 865
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 8, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 90 A.D.3d 472 (Ana Link, Ltd. v. Mega U.S.A., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ana Link, Ltd. v. Mega U.S.A., Inc., 90 A.D.3d 472, 933 N.Y.2d 865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

A party cannot appeal from a judgment or order entered against it upon its default (CPLR 5511; Salomon v Angsten, 63 AD3d 564 [2009]; Matter of Darryl P., 228 AD2d 176 [1996]). Since defendant failed to take a direct appeal from the order denying its motion to vacate the default, that order is not reviewable by this Court.

Were we able to reach the merits, we would affirm denial of the motion to vacate because no reasonable excuse was offered for defendant’s failure to answer or its failure to obtain counsel within 30 days of the withdrawal of its former counsel (see CPLR 321; Benson Park Assoc., LLC v Herman, 73 AD3d 464, 465 [2010]. Moreover, defendant’s alleged meritorious defenses are, at best, questionable.

We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Saxe, Sweeny, Acosta and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

1825 Madison Retail, LLC v. Exclusive Dental Studios, PLLC
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 A.D.3d 472, 933 N.Y.2d 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ana-link-ltd-v-mega-usa-inc-nyappdiv-2011.