Ana Guerrero Garrido v. Paul Bordallo and Audrey Bordallo

338 F.2d 701
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 16, 1964
Docket19104
StatusPublished

This text of 338 F.2d 701 (Ana Guerrero Garrido v. Paul Bordallo and Audrey Bordallo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ana Guerrero Garrido v. Paul Bordallo and Audrey Bordallo, 338 F.2d 701 (9th Cir. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Appellant made a challenge in the trial court to the jury panel. As framed and as timed there, we cannot sustain it.

We have considered all specifications of error, but do not agree with them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
338 F.2d 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ana-guerrero-garrido-v-paul-bordallo-and-audrey-bordallo-ca9-1964.