Ana Gonzalez-Cruz v. Loretta E. Lynch
This text of 633 F. App'x 361 (Ana Gonzalez-Cruz v. Loretta E. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Ana Gonzalez-Cruz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings conducted in ab-sentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir.2005), and we deny the petition for review.
The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Gonzalez-Cruz’s motion to reopen. Gonzalez-Cruz was personally served with the hearing notice for her July 10, 2012, hearing, and failed to show that exceptional circumstances caused her to miss her July 10, 2012, hearing, where the declaration accompanying her motion to reopen asserts that an officer from the Intensive Supervision Appearance Program informed her that her June 2012 hearing was cancelled. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii); Khan v. Ashcroft, 374 F.3d 825, 828 (9th Cir.2004) (actual notice is sufficient to meet due process requirements); 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(e)(l) (defining the term “exceptional circumstances”).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3. •
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
633 F. App'x 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ana-gonzalez-cruz-v-loretta-e-lynch-ca9-2016.