Ana Esquivel v. Edward Martinez

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 4, 2009
Docket03-08-00792-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Ana Esquivel v. Edward Martinez (Ana Esquivel v. Edward Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ana Esquivel v. Edward Martinez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN




NO. 03-08-00792-CV

Ana Esquivel, Appellant



v.



Edward Martinez, Appellee



FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-FM-00-001282, HONORABLE DERWOOD JOHNSON, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E RPER CURIAM

The notice of appeal in this cause was filed on December 30, 2008. On February 3, 2009, in response to our notice that the record was overdue, the court reporter informed us that she had not received a request for the record, nor had arrangements been made to pay for the record. On February 27, 2009, in response to further inquiry by this Court, the court reporter stated that she still had not received a request or payment for the record. On March 12, 2009, we sent appellant's counsel notice that the reporter's record was nearly four months overdue and that the court reporter had informed us that appellant had not paid or made arrangements to pay for the record. We stated that unless arrangements to pay were made promptly, we would consider the appeal without the reporter's record and that appellant's brief would be due on April 13, 2009. On March 31, 2009, counsel contacted this Court to say that he would call the court reporter to find out if a record was taken. That was the last communication we received from counsel related to the reporter's record until May 26, 2009, and on April 17, counsel filed his first motion for an extension of time to file appellant's brief, making no mention of the reporter's record in the motion.

On May 26, 2009, we received counsel's motion for extension of time to file the reporter's record, which states, "The transcript in this case is due on Monday, May 26, 2009." Counsel asks for a thirty-day extension of time and states that on May 18, 2009, the court reporter asked for a two-week extension of time and that appellant paid for the record on May 21, 2009. With regard to the reporter's record, appellant is requested to provide, no later than June 11, 2009, documentation showing that the record has been paid for, as well as the May 18 letter from the court reporter. Failure to provide that documentation by June 11 will result in the consideration of the appeal without a reporter's record.

Also on May 26, 2009, we received a third motion for extension of time to file appellant's brief, asking for another thirty days to file. We grant the motion to extend and order counsel to file appellant's brief no later than June 25, 2009. Failure to file the brief will result in dismissal for want of prosecution or other action by this Court.



Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Henson

Filed: June 4, 2009

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ana Esquivel v. Edward Martinez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ana-esquivel-v-edward-martinez-texapp-2009.