AMY WARNER v. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI POLICE DEPARTMENT
Opinion
Southern District of Texas ENTERED March 20, 2026 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Nathan Ochsner, Clerk SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION AMY WARNER, § Plaintiff, V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-CV-00040 CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI POLICE DEPARTMENT, § Defendant. ,
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jason Libby’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 31). The M&R recommends that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's remaining claims for failure to state a claim. Jd. at 13. The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States vy. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell vy. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700, 2015 WL 3823141, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.) (citation omitted). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 31). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's remaining claims for failure to state a claim. The Court DENIES as moot any other pending motions. The Court will enter final judgment separately.
1/2
— UE. DAVI ORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas March 72,2026
2/2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
AMY WARNER v. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI POLICE DEPARTMENT (AMY WARNER v. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI POLICE DEPARTMENT) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.