Amy Reece Bolz v. John R Bolz
This text of Amy Reece Bolz v. John R Bolz (Amy Reece Bolz v. John R Bolz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
April 4, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman 148754 & (22) Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano, AMY REECE BOLZ, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, v SC: 148754 COA: 319535 Washtenaw CC Family Division: 11-001670-DM JOHN R. BOLZ, Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the December 18, 2013 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 4, 2014 s0401 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Amy Reece Bolz v. John R Bolz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amy-reece-bolz-v-john-r-bolz-mich-2014.