AMY KNIGHTS v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 1, 2023
Docket22-0026
StatusPublished

This text of AMY KNIGHTS v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION (AMY KNIGHTS v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
AMY KNIGHTS v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, (Fla. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed March 1, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-0026 Lower Tribunal No. 18-25630 ________________

Amy Knights, Appellant,

vs.

Citizens Property Insurance Corporation, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Gina Beovides, Judge.

Font & Nelson, PLLC, and Jose P. Font, and James C. Thomas (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant.

Roig Lawyers, and Abbi Freifeld Carr, and Jeffrey R. Geldens (Deerfield Beach), for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LINDSEY, and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Appellant Amy Knights appeals a final judgment entered in favor of

Appellee Citizens Property Insurance Corporation. Knight sued Citizens

under her homeowner’s insurance policy seeking recovery for damages

allegedly caused by a water heater leak. Citizens denied coverage on the

basis that the leak was determined to be caused by constant, repeated

leakage or seepage, a cause specifically excluded by the policy. A jury

returned a verdict in favor of Citizens. Knights argues on appeal that the

verdict was a product of error, either because the trial court erroneously

rejected her proposed jury instructions and verdict form, or because the trial

court used the wrong instruction and verdict form. We disagree. Finding no

abuse of discretion by the trial court, we affirm. See St. Paul Mercury Ins.

Co. v. Coconut Grove Bank, 106 So. 3d 452, 454 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009);

Gonzalez v. Rose, 752 So. 2d 39, 41-42 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Sorrells v.

Montesino, 2 So. 3d 297, 299 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gonzalez v. Rose
752 So. 2d 39 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. v. Coconut Grove Bank
106 So. 3d 452 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Sorrells v. Montesino
2 So. 3d 297 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
AMY KNIGHTS v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amy-knights-v-citizens-property-insurance-corporation-fladistctapp-2023.