Amy Kim and Coochie L.L.C. v. Marbach Partners, L.P

Court of Appeals of Texas

Amy Kim and Coochie L.L.C. v. Marbach Partners, L.P

DecidedMarch 25, 2009

Docket04-08-00319-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Amy Kim and Coochie L.L.C. v. Marbach Partners, L.P (Amy Kim and Coochie L.L.C. v. Marbach Partners, L.P) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Amy Kim and Coochie L.L.C. v. Marbach Partners, L.P, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00319-CV

Amy KIM and Coochie L.L.C., Appellants

v.

MARBACH PARTNERS, L.P., Appellee

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2006-CI-18726 Honorable Andy Mireles, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 25, 2009

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; DISMISSED

On February 9, 2009, we ordered appellants Amy Kim and Coochie L.L.C., to file a response, not later than February 19, 2009, to appellee's motions to dismiss. We advised appellants that failure to timely file an appropriate response could result in the appeal being dismissed for want of prosecution. No response to our order has been filed. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. Appellee's motion for damages for a frivolous appeal is denied. All costs are taxed against appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00319-CV

Amy KIM and Coochie L.L.C., Appellants

v.

MARBACH PARTNERS, L.P., Appellee

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2006-CI-18726 Honorable Andy Mireles, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 25, 2009

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; DISMISSED

On February 9, 2009, we ordered appellants Amy Kim and Coochie L.L.C., to file a response, not later than February 19, 2009, to appellee's motions to dismiss. We advised appellants that failure to timely file an appropriate response could result in the appeal being dismissed for want of prosecution. No response to our order has been filed. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. Appellee's motion for damages for a frivolous appeal is denied. All costs are taxed against appellants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Amy Kim and Coochie L.L.C. v. Marbach Partners, L.P, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amy-kim-and-coochie-llc-v-marbach-partners-lp-texapp-2009.