Amy Hughes v. Andrew Kisela

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Amy Hughes v. Andrew Kisela. Read the opinion of the Court — 841 F.3d 1081
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 6, 2018·No. 14-15059·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AMY HUGHES, No. 14-15059 Plaintiff-Appellant,

D.C. No.

v. 4:11-cv-00366-

FRZ

ANDREW KISELA, Corporal, 0203; individually and in his official capacity, OPINION Defendant-Appellee.

On Remand From The United States Supreme Court

Filed June 6, 2018

Before: Ronald M. Gould and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges, and William K. Sessions III, * District Judge.

*

The Honorable William K. Sessions III, United States District Judge for the District of Vermont, sitting by designation.

2 HUGHES V. KISELA

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

In view of the Supreme Court’s opinion dated April 2, 2018, we affirm the decision of the district court.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amy Hughes v. Andrew Kisela, (9th Cir. 2018).

Amy Hughes v. Andrew Kisela (Amy Hughes v. Andrew Kisela) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.