Amy Hughes v. Andrew Kisela
This text of Amy Hughes v. Andrew Kisela (Amy Hughes v. Andrew Kisela) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AMY HUGHES, No. 14-15059 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 4:11-cv-00366- FRZ ANDREW KISELA, Corporal, 0203; individually and in his official capacity, OPINION Defendant-Appellee.
On Remand From The United States Supreme Court
Filed June 6, 2018
Before: Ronald M. Gould and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges, and William K. Sessions III, * District Judge.
* The Honorable William K. Sessions III, United States District Judge for the District of Vermont, sitting by designation. 2 HUGHES V. KISELA
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
In view of the Supreme Court’s opinion dated April 2, 2018, we affirm the decision of the district court.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Amy Hughes v. Andrew Kisela, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amy-hughes-v-andrew-kisela-ca9-2018.