Amy Hinman v. State of Florida

132 So. 3d 1114, 2014 WL 148573, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 136
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 16, 2014
DocketSC12-2501
StatusPublished

This text of 132 So. 3d 1114 (Amy Hinman v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amy Hinman v. State of Florida, 132 So. 3d 1114, 2014 WL 148573, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 136 (Fla. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in State v. Hinman, 100 So.3d 220 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.

It is so ordered.

POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. LEWIS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hinman
100 So. 3d 220 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 So. 3d 1114, 2014 WL 148573, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amy-hinman-v-state-of-florida-fla-2014.