Amy Hinman v. State of Florida

132 So. 3d 1114, 2014 WL 148573, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 136

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in State v. Hinman, 100 So.3d 220 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.

It is so ordered.

POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. LEWIS, J., dissents.