Amy Herman and Fatma Herman D/B/A Just Good Stuff v. Randy Stevenson
This text of Amy Herman and Fatma Herman D/B/A Just Good Stuff v. Randy Stevenson (Amy Herman and Fatma Herman D/B/A Just Good Stuff v. Randy Stevenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-25-00468-CV __________________
AMY HERMAN AND FATMA HERMAN D/B/A JUST GOOD STUFF, Appellants
V.
RANDY STEVENSON, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6 Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 25-34807 __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On November 13, 2025, Appellants Amy Herman and Fatma Herman d/b/a
Just Good Stuff filed a notice of appeal from a final judgment for possession in Trial
Cause Number 25-34807 signed on October 15, 2025. The reporter’s record was
filed on December 29, 2025, and the clerk’s record was filed on February 13, 2026.
The Clerk of the Court notified the parties that Appellants’ Brief was due March 16,
2026.
1 On April 14, 2026, the Clerk of the Court issued a letter that informed the
parties that the Court had received Appellants’ brief, that identified specific
deficiencies in the brief, and that directed Appellants to file a compliant brief and
serve a copy of the brief on Appellee by April 24, 2026. No party responded to the
notice from the Clerk.
On May 12, 2026, the Clerk of the Court issued a notice that the appeal would
be submitted on the record alone unless by May 22, 2026, Appellants filed a
compliant brief and a motion for extension of time to file the brief. The Clerk warned
Appellants that submission without briefs could result in dismissal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a) (If an appellant fails to timely file a brief,
the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution or decline to
dismiss the appeal and give further direction to the case as it considers proper.). No
party filed a response to the Clerk’s notice.
On June 16, 2026, the Clerk of the Court notified the parties that the appeal
would be submitted to the Court without oral argument on July 7, 2026.
We submitted this case without briefs. That said, in the interest of justice, we
have reviewed the entire record on appeal. See id. 39.8; 42.3 (When the appellant
fails to prosecute the appeal, “the appellate court may dismiss the appeal or affirm
the appealed judgment or order.”). Having found no reversible error on appeal, we
affirm the trial court’s judgment. See id. 43.2(a). Judgment is rendered against the
2 sureties on Appellants’ supersedeas bond for the performance of the judgment and
for costs rendered against Appellants. See id. 43.5.
AFFIRMED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on July 7, 2026 Opinion Delivered July 9, 2026
Before Golemon, C.J., Wright and Chambers, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Amy Herman and Fatma Herman D/B/A Just Good Stuff v. Randy Stevenson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amy-herman-and-fatma-herman-dba-just-good-stuff-v-randy-stevenson-txctapp9-2026.