Amy Guedea and Luis Guedea Veloz v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 20, 2011
Docket03-10-00220-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Amy Guedea and Luis Guedea Veloz v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (Amy Guedea and Luis Guedea Veloz v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amy Guedea and Luis Guedea Veloz v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN




NO. 03-10-00220-CV

Amy Guedea and Luis Guedea Veloz, Appellant



v.



Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee



FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY, 33RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 36,304, HONORABLE ROB HOFMANN, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N


Appellants Amy Guedea and Luis Guedea Veloz filed this accelerated appeal from the district court's final order terminating their parental rights to their minor children, E.A.B.G., R.L.G., G.G., P.J.G., and L.R.G. Appellants' court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced on appeal. See also Taylor v. Texas Dep't of Protective & Regulatory Servs., 160 S.W.3d 641, 646-47 (Tex. App.--Austin 2005, pet. denied) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental rights). Counsel has certified to this Court that she provided appellants with a copy of the Anders brief and a notice of their right to examine the appellate record and file pro se briefs. No pro se briefs have been filed.



We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. Finding nothing in the record that might arguably support an appeal, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the order of termination.



J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Henson and Goodwin



Affirmed



Filed: May 20, 2011

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Taylor v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services
160 S.W.3d 641 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Amy Guedea and Luis Guedea Veloz v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amy-guedea-and-luis-guedea-veloz-v-texas-departmen-texapp-2011.