Amy Dannette Jackson v. State
This text of Amy Dannette Jackson v. State (Amy Dannette Jackson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-16-00079-CR
AMY DANNETTE JACKSON, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 102nd District Court Red River County, Texas Trial Court No. CR02147
Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. ORDER
Our review of the clerk’s record in this case indicates that it contains “sensitive data” as
that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a driver’s license number, passport number, social security
number, tax identification number or similar government-issued personal identification number.”
TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(1). The clerk’s record contains the appellant’s social security number.
Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court,
including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b).
Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper
form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the
clerk’s record contains sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in
accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed clerk’s record in this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: October 4, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Amy Dannette Jackson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amy-dannette-jackson-v-state-texapp-2016.