Amy Anne Shouldice v. Christine Elizabeth Van Hamersveld and John D. Thompson, Jr.
This text of Amy Anne Shouldice v. Christine Elizabeth Van Hamersveld and John D. Thompson, Jr. (Amy Anne Shouldice v. Christine Elizabeth Van Hamersveld and John D. Thompson, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
_________________
NO. 09-18-00355-CV _________________
AMY ANNE SHOULDICE, Appellant
V.
CHRISTINE ELIZABETH VAN HAMERSVELD AND JOHN D. THOMPSON JR., Appellees ________________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 17-35611-P ________________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On November 29, 2018, the trial court found that Appellant, Amy Anne
Shouldice, can afford to pay costs for the appeal. She did not file a motion for
appellate review of the trial court’s ruling. See generally Tex. R. Civ. P. 145(g). On
January 10, 2019, the trial court clerk notified this Court that Appellant had not paid
for the record, and we warned the parties that unless we received the clerk’s record
1 by February 8, 2019, the appeal would be dismissed without further notice. See Tex.
R. App. P. 37.3(b). On February 11, 2019, the trial court clerk notified this Court
that Appellant has not paid the cost for the record. The appeal is dismissed for want
of prosecution. See id; see also Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. 1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
________________________________ CHARLES KREGER Justice
Submitted on February 20, 2019 Opinion Delivered February 21, 2019
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger, and Johnson, JJ.
1 On November 2, 2018, Christine Elizabeth Van Hamersveld and John D. Thompson Jr. filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s July 19, 2018 Order Granting Applicant’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to Undue Influence. They neither paid for a record to be prepared nor requested that the appeal continue as to their cross-appeal. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Amy Anne Shouldice v. Christine Elizabeth Van Hamersveld and John D. Thompson, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amy-anne-shouldice-v-christine-elizabeth-van-hamersveld-and-john-d-texapp-2019.