Amwest Surety Insurance Co. v. State

721 So. 2d 408, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14784, 1998 WL 821918
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 20, 1998
DocketNo. 97-1215
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 721 So. 2d 408 (Amwest Surety Insurance Co. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amwest Surety Insurance Co. v. State, 721 So. 2d 408, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14784, 1998 WL 821918 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The record shows that in 1992 James Perkins was charged with a crime or crimes. He obtained a $100,000 bond from Amwest Surety Insurance Company through A. Tom-linson’s Bail Bond Company. At some point, Perkins committed suicide. Initially the bond was forfeited by court order.

Amwest filed a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540, on the ground that Perkins’ suicide rendered his return pursuant to the bond an impossibility. On October 14, 1996, the court granted the motion and ordered the forfeited funds to be returned to Amwest.

On October 24, 1996, Orange County filed a motion to stay the order on the ground that it had not received a copy of the order and was unable to file an appeal or motion for rehearing. The judge rendered an order on that same day granting a stay for ten days.

On November 5,1996, past the time granted for the stay, Orange County filed a motion for rehearing, rather than an appeal. This rehearing motion was directed towards an order rendered pursuant to Rule 1.540. Am-west moved to strike the motion for rehearing on the ground that it was untimely. A successor judge reserved ruling and on April 11, 1997, he granted the motion for rehearing. In this proceeding Amwest appeals from that order.

We agree with Amwest that the trial judge was without jurisdiction to grant the county’s untimely motion for rehearing. We therefore quash the order of April 11, 1997, which quashal, in effect, affirms the trial court order dated October 14, 1996, which set aside the bond estreature.

ORDER QUASHED, CAUSE REMANDED.

COBB and HARRIS, JJ., concur. W. SHARP, J., concurs specially, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smeltz v. State
818 So. 2d 538 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
721 So. 2d 408, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14784, 1998 WL 821918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amwest-surety-insurance-co-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.