Amvd Center Inc v. Crum & Forster Insur
This text of Amvd Center Inc v. Crum & Forster Insur (Amvd Center Inc v. Crum & Forster Insur) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129246 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan AMVD CENTER, INC., Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff-Appellant, Stephen J. Markman, Justices
v SC: 129246 COA: 252467 Calhoun CC: 00-002906-CZ CRUM & FORSTER INSURANCE,
Defendant-Appellee,
and NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant/Cross-Defendant-
Appellee,
and MARK FEDERAU and OKEMOS AGENCY,
INC., d/b/a FIRST FINANCIAL AGENCY, INC.,
and d/b/a FEDERAU GROUP,
Defendants/Cross-Plaintiffs-
Appellees.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 28, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. February 27, 2006 _________________________________________ p0221 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Amvd Center Inc v. Crum & Forster Insur, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amvd-center-inc-v-crum-forster-insur-mich-2006.