A.M.V. v. State
840 So. 2d 1071, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1148, 2003 WL 244800
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 31, 2003·No. No. 3D03-283·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
From the Petition of the juvenile and the State’s response, it is plain that the court failed to determine any risk assessment involved in this proceeding.
Accordingly, the Petition for Habeas Corpus is granted and the juvenile is ordered discharged instanter. See. R.G. v. State, 817 So.2d 1019, 1020 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
A.M.V. v. State, 840 So. 2d 1071, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1148, 2003 WL 244800 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
840 So. 2d 1071 (A.M.V. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chavarria v. Selugal Clothing, Inc.
840 So. 2d 1071 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)