Amundson v. Armstrong
This text of 157 N.E. 846 (Amundson v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Without passing upon other questions presented by this appeal, we hold that the petitioner’s failure to comply with the provisions of sections 7 and 8 of General Ordinance No. 1 of 1921 of the city of Yonkers justifies the action of the Superintendent of Buildings in refusing a permit for the erection of a billboard, and that no question as to the constitutional validity of such ordinance is presented by the record.
The order should be affirmed with costs.
Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 N.E. 846, 245 N.Y. 533, 1927 N.Y. LEXIS 688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amundson-v-armstrong-ny-1927.