Amundson v. Armstrong

New York Court of Appeals

Amundson v. Armstrong

157 N.E. 846, 245 N.Y. 533, 1927 N.Y. LEXIS 688

New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 7, 1927·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Without passing upon other questions presented by this appeal, we hold that the petitioner’s failure to comply with the provisions of sections 7 and 8 of General Ordinance No. 1 of 1921 of the city of Yonkers justifies the action of the Superintendent of Buildings in refusing a permit for the erection of a billboard, and that no question as to the constitutional validity of such ordinance is presented by the record.

The order should be affirmed with costs.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Without passing upon other questions presented by this appeal, we hold that the petitioner’s failure to comply with the provisions of sections 7 and 8 of General Ordinance No. 1 of 1921 of the city of Yonkers justifies the action of the Superintendent of Buildings in refusing a permit for the erection of a billboard, and that no question as to the constitutional validity of such ordinance is presented by the record.

The order should be affirmed with costs.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Amundson v. Armstrong, 157 N.E. 846, 245 N.Y. 533, 1927 N.Y. LEXIS 688 (N.Y. 1927).

Pincite

157 N.E. 846 (Amundson v. Armstrong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related