Amtrac Railroad Contractors or Maryland, Inc. v. West Virginia Railroad Maintenance Authority

West Virginia Court of Claims

Amtrac Railroad Contractors or Maryland, Inc. v. West Virginia Railroad Maintenance Authority

21 Ct. Cl. 149

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedJanuary 29, 1997

DocketClaim No. CC-95-125

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Ct. Cl. 149 (Amtrac Railroad Contractors or Maryland, Inc. v. West Virginia Railroad Maintenance Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Amtrac Railroad Contractors or Maryland, Inc. v. West Virginia Railroad Maintenance Authority, 21 Ct. Cl. 149 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

FINAL ORDER

On a prior day came the Claimant, by counsel, James R. Watson, and came the Respondent, by counsel, JohnS. Dalporto, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Jeffrey G. Blaydes, Assistant Attorney General, who represented to the Court that the matters at issue in this claim have been fully compromised and settled, subject to the approval of this Court and the Legislature, and that the parties have agreed that the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) should be paid to the claimant and that such sum includes any and all claims, causes of action, counterclaims, affirmative defenses, interest, and/or set-offs, of whatever design or character which each respective party may have or hereafter have by reason of the events more particularly described, set forth and/or elicited in the pleadings and prior proceedings of this claim, with the exception of any and all claims which the State or the Rail Authority may now have or in the future may have against Amtrac for latent defects or warranty obligations or both.

Upon consideration of all of which, it is hereby ORDERED that the Claimant is granted an award in the total amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00).

David W. Baker, Presiding Judge

Seen and Approved by:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FINAL ORDER

On a prior day came the Claimant, by counsel, James R. Watson, and came the Respondent, by counsel, JohnS. Dalporto, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Jeffrey G. Blaydes, Assistant Attorney General, who represented to the Court that the matters at issue in this claim have been fully compromised and settled, subject to the approval of this Court and the Legislature, and that the parties have agreed that the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) should be paid to the claimant and that such sum includes any and all claims, causes of action, counterclaims, affirmative defenses, interest, and/or set-offs, of whatever design or character which each respective party may have or hereafter have by reason of the events more particularly described, set forth and/or elicited in the pleadings and prior proceedings of this claim, with the exception of any and all claims which the State or the Rail Authority may now have or in the future may have against Amtrac for latent defects or warranty obligations or both.

Upon consideration of all of which, it is hereby ORDERED that the Claimant is granted an award in the total amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00).

David W. Baker, Presiding Judge

Seen and Approved by:

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Ct. Cl. 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amtrac-railroad-contractors-or-maryland-inc-v-west-virginia-railroad-wvctcl-1997.