Amstutz v. King

103 Ohio St. (N.S.) 674
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 21, 1921
DocketNos. 16285 and 16286
StatusPublished

This text of 103 Ohio St. (N.S.) 674 (Amstutz v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amstutz v. King, 103 Ohio St. (N.S.) 674 (Ohio 1921).

Opinion

Judgments affirmed on authority of Gillette v. Tucker, 67 Ohio St., 106, and Bowers v. Santee, 99 Ohio St., 361.

Judgments affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur. Johnson, Hough and Wanamaker, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 Ohio St. (N.S.) 674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amstutz-v-king-ohio-1921.