Amsterdam v. Mandel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Amsterdam v. Mandel

273 A.D. 895, 77 N.Y.S.2d 59, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5179

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 1, 1948·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover brokerage commissions, order denying plaintiff’s motion to examine two witnesses — alleged agents of defendant — before trial, reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs, the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. The facts disclosed by the affidavit show the existence of special circumstances entitling plaintiff to the examination. (Bloede Co. V. Devine Go., 211 App. Div. 180; Barber v. DeBruin, 253 App. Div. 909; Laruffa v. Astarita, 264 App. Div. 785.) Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover brokerage commissions, order denying plaintiff’s motion to examine two witnesses — alleged agents of defendant — before trial, reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs, the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. The facts disclosed by the affidavit show the existence of special circumstances entitling plaintiff to the examination. (Bloede Co. V. Devine Go., 211 App. Div. 180; Barber v. DeBruin, 253 App. Div. 909; Laruffa v. Astarita, 264 App. Div. 785.) Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.

Amsterdam v. Mandel, 273 A.D. 895, 77 N.Y.S.2d 59, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5179 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

273 A.D. 895 (Amsterdam v. Mandel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related