Amsterdam v. Mandel

273 A.D. 895, 77 N.Y.S.2d 59, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5179
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 1, 1948
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 273 A.D. 895 (Amsterdam v. Mandel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amsterdam v. Mandel, 273 A.D. 895, 77 N.Y.S.2d 59, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5179 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Opinion

In an action to recover brokerage commissions, order denying plaintiff’s motion to examine two witnesses — alleged agents of defendant — before trial, reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs, the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. The facts disclosed by the affidavit show the existence of special circumstances entitling plaintiff to the examination. (Bloede Co. V. Devine Go., 211 App. Div. 180; Barber v. DeBruin, 253 App. Div. 909; Laruffa v. Astarita, 264 App. Div. 785.) Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lyon v. Fieldgren Realty Corp.
273 A.D. 917 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
273 A.D. 895, 77 N.Y.S.2d 59, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amsterdam-v-mandel-nyappdiv-1948.