Amsterdam Urban Renewal Agency v. McGrattan
449 N.E.2d 1273, 59 N.Y.2d 624, 463 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3033
This text of 449 N.E.2d 1273 (Amsterdam Urban Renewal Agency v. McGrattan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Amsterdam Urban Renewal Agency v. McGrattan, 449 N.E.2d 1273, 59 N.Y.2d 624, 463 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3033 (N.Y. 1983).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (91 AD2d 792).
[626]*626Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons. -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Reliance National Indemnity Company v. Alston Jennings, Jr. Wright, Lindsey & Jennings, a Partnership
189 F.3d 689 (Eighth Circuit, 1999)
Davis Auction House, Inc. v. Ontario National Bank
201 A.D.2d 878 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Donald P. Ferguson
982 F.2d 404 (Tenth Circuit, 1992)
Muller v. Sherburne, Powers & Needham
143 F.R.D. 537 (S.D. New York, 1992)
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Ferguson
982 F.2d 404 (Tenth Circuit, 1991)
Scognamillo v. Olsen
795 P.2d 1357 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1990)
Somma v. Gracey
544 A.2d 668 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1988)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
449 N.E.2d 1273, 59 N.Y.2d 624, 463 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3033, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amsterdam-urban-renewal-agency-v-mcgrattan-ny-1983.