AmSouth Bank, N.A. v. Holland

669 So. 2d 159, 1995 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 464, 1995 WL 490592
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedAugust 18, 1995
DocketAV93000572
StatusPublished

This text of 669 So. 2d 159 (AmSouth Bank, N.A. v. Holland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
AmSouth Bank, N.A. v. Holland, 669 So. 2d 159, 1995 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 464, 1995 WL 490592 (Ala. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

RICHARD L. HOLMES, Retired Appellate Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion of July 14, 1995, 669 So.2d 154, the judgment is now affirmed in part, reversed in part, and the ease is remanded to the trial court for proceedings consistent with the supreme court’s opinion of July 14, 1995.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by Retired Appellate Judge RICHARD L. HOLMES while serving on active duty status as a judge of this court under the provisions of § 12-18-10(e), Ala.Code 1975.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte AmSouth Bank of Alabama
669 So. 2d 154 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
669 So. 2d 159, 1995 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 464, 1995 WL 490592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amsouth-bank-na-v-holland-alacivapp-1995.