Amsler, J. v. Orchard House Prop. LLC

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 21, 2016·No. 1893 MDA 2015·Unpublished

Opinion

J-S43018-16

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

JEFFREY AMSLER, KAREN AMSLER, AND IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KATHRYN CORRIGAN PENNSYLVANIA

Appellants

v.

ORCHARD HOUSE PROPERTIES LLC, FRED R. AMSLER JR., FRED R. AMSLER JR. LIVING TRUST, DONNA J. AMER, AND CAMBRIDGE TRAINING PARTNERS L.P.

Appellees No. 1893 MDA 2015

Appeal from the Order September 25, 2015 In the Court of Common Pleas of Sullivan County Civil Division at No(s): 2013-CV-253

BEFORE: GANTMAN, P.J., PANELLA, J., and JENKINS, J.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY PANELLA, J. FILED JUNE 21, 2016

Appellants, Jeffrey Amsler, Karen Amsler, and Kathryn Corrigan,

appeal from the order entered September 25, 2015, in the court of Common

Pleas of Sullivan County. After careful review, we dismiss Appellants’ appeal

as moot.

Appellants appeal from the September 25, 2015 order granting

Appellees’ motion for reconsideration of the lower court’s May 14, 2015

order overruling Appellees’ preliminary objection to compel arbitration. Prior

to the instant appeal, Appellees filed a timely appeal from the court’s May

14, 2015 order at docket number 1029 MDA 2015. By memorandum opinion

filed February 17, 2016, a panel of this Court vacated the trial court’s May J-S43018-16

14, 2015 order overruling Appellees’ preliminary objection to enforce the

arbitration agreement and remanded the case for further proceedings. See

Amsler v. Orchard House Properties LLC, 1029 MDA 2015 (Pa. Super.,

filed Feb. 17, 2016) (mem. op.) (Panella, J.). The resolution of those

proceedings is still pending in the court below.

As this Court has vacated the trial court’s May 14, 2015 order, it

necessarily follows that the court’s September 25, 2015 order granting

Appellees’ motion for reconsideration of that order, from which this appeal is

taken, is a legal nullity. Accordingly, Appellants’ appeal from the September

25, 2015 order is rendered moot.

Appellant’s appeal is dismissed as moot.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 6/21/2016

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amsler, J. v. Orchard House Prop. LLC, (Pa. Ct. App. 2016).

Amsler, J. v. Orchard House Prop. LLC (Amsler, J. v. Orchard House Prop. LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.