Amsler & Ferguson v. Lamar & Rankin Drug Co.
This text of 92 S.E. 55 (Amsler & Ferguson v. Lamar & Rankin Drug Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Equity cases shall be tried in the county where a defendant resides against whom substantial relief is prayed, except that in cases of injunction to stay pending proceedings the ■ suit may be brought in the county where the proceedings are pending, provided no relief is prayed as to matters not included in such litigation. Civil Code, §§ 6540, 5527.
2. In an equitable suit to enjoin a levying officer from paying over money in his hands on a chattel mortgage duly foreclosed, to which no counter-affidavit has been filed, where there is no complaint of misconduct upon his part, the levying officer is not a party against whom substantial relief is prayed, and the venue of a suit instituted by the mortgagor against the mortgagee and such officer, to enjoin the collection of the mortgage debt, is in the county of the residence of the mortgagee. Malsby v. Studstill, 127 Ga. 726 (56 S. E. 988).
3. The petition was properly dismissed on demurrer.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 S.E. 55, 146 Ga. 635, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amsler-ferguson-v-lamar-rankin-drug-co-ga-1917.