Amsden v. Senate Committee

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided May 15, 1995·No. 94-2108·Published

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion



May 15, 1995
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________

No. 94-2108

HENRY H. AMSDEN, H.H. AMSDEN & SONS,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

SENATE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

[Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, U.S. District Judge] ___________________

____________________

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge, ___________
Selya and Boudin, Circuit Judges. ______________

____________________

Henry H. Amsden, on brief pro se. _______________
Paul M. Gagnon, United States Attorney, and T. David Plourde, _______________ _________________
Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellees.

____________________

____________________

Per Curiam. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and __________

the record on appeal. There was no error in the district

court's dismissal of the complaint for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction nor its denial of the subsequent motion to

vacate on the additional ground of mootness.

Affirmed. See Loc. R. 27.1. _________ ___

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amsden v. Senate Committee, (1st Cir. 1995).

Amsden v. Senate Committee (Amsden v. Senate Committee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.