Amsby v. Dickhouse

4 Cal. 103
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1854
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 4 Cal. 103 (Amsby v. Dickhouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amsby v. Dickhouse, 4 Cal. 103 (Cal. 1854).

Opinion

Mr. Ch. J. Murray

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. J. Heydeneeldt and Wells concurred.

It is well settled that a juror cannot be allowed to impeach his own verdict. The reason of this wholesome rule of law is too obvious to require any explanation.

The Court below erred in setting aside the verdict of the jury, and granting a new trial, upon the affidavit of a juror of his own and his fellow juror’s misconduct.

Aside from this, there appears to have been a conflict of testimony, and the jury having passed upon the facts, it was improper to disturb their verdict, except upon sufficient legal reasons.

The order for a new trial is reversed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Ritchie
42 P. 209 (Utah Supreme Court, 1895)
Griffiths v. Montandon
39 P. 548 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1895)
People v. Azoff
39 P. 59 (California Supreme Court, 1895)
Territory v. Taylor
1 Dakota 479 (Supreme Court of Dakota, 1877)
Boyce v. California Stage Co.
25 Cal. 460 (California Supreme Court, 1864)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Cal. 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amsby-v-dickhouse-cal-1854.