Amrod v. Briarwood Properties, Inc.

74 A.D.2d 628, 425 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10296

This text of 74 A.D.2d 628 (Amrod v. Briarwood Properties, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amrod v. Briarwood Properties, Inc., 74 A.D.2d 628, 425 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10296 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinions

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, entered in Orange County on October 19, 1978, as upon reargument, adhered to the original determination granting respondent’s motion for a protective order. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. No costs are awarded in view of the fact that the respondent’s brief was filed late, contrary to the rules of this court. Mollen, P. J., Damiani and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rugby Excavators, Inc. v. Juliano
40 A.D.2d 1024 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 A.D.2d 628, 425 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amrod-v-briarwood-properties-inc-nyappdiv-1980.