Amr v. Virginia State University

331 F. App'x 194
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 6, 2009·No. No. 09-1184·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Salame M. Amr appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Amr v. Virginia State Univ., No. 3:07-cv-00628-REP, 2009 WL 112829 (E.D.Va. Jan. 14, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amr v. Virginia State University, 331 F. App'x 194 (4th Cir. 2009).

331 F. App'x 194 (Amr v. Virginia State University) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.