Amr v. Moore

510 F. App'x 302
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 25, 2013
DocketNo. 12-2334
StatusPublished

This text of 510 F. App'x 302 (Amr v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amr v. Moore, 510 F. App'x 302 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Salame M. Amr appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to disqualify. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Amr v. Moore, No. 3:07-cv-00628-REP (E.D.Va. Sept. 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
510 F. App'x 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amr-v-moore-ca4-2013.