Amr v. Moore

411 F. App'x 584
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 16, 2011·No. No. 10-2041·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Salame M. Amr appeals the district court’s orders, both entered on August 9, 2009, adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendations and dismissing his complaint, and denying Amr’s subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Amr v. Moore, No. 3:09-cv-00667-REP, 2010 WL 3154567 (E.D.Va. Aug. 9, 2010). We deny Amr’s motions to supplement, for default judgment, for subpoenas, and for reconsideration and relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amr v. Moore, 411 F. App'x 584 (4th Cir. 2011).

411 F. App'x 584 (Amr v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.