Amr v. Attorney General of Virginia

Fourth Circuit

Amr v. Attorney General of Virginia

469 F. App'x 210

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 19, 2012·No. No. 11-2171·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Salame M. Amr appeals the district court’s orders granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss and for sanctions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Amr v. Attorney Gen. of Va., No. 3:11-cv-00423-REP (E.D.Va. Sept. 22, 23 & 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Salame M. Amr appeals the district court’s orders granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss and for sanctions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Amr v. Attorney Gen. of Va., No. 3:11-cv-00423-REP (E.D.Va. Sept. 22, 23 & 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Amr v. Attorney General of Virginia, 469 F. App'x 210 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

469 F. App'x 210 (Amr v. Attorney General of Virginia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.