Ampofo v. Brydson

2016 NY Slip Op 8023, 144 A.D.3d 611, 41 N.Y.S.3d 424
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 29, 2016·No. 2343 304085/12·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

*612 Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered January 14, 2016, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.

In this action for personal injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident, the record shows that while plaintiff’s approach into the intersection was regulated by a stop sign and no traffic control devices regulated defendant’s approach, issues of fact preclude summary judgment. That there are issues of fact is highlighted by the parties’ deposition testimony as well as the point of contact between the vehicles. Such issues include whether plaintiff had stopped before entering the intersection, which of the vehicles entered the intersection first, which driver had the right-of-way, and whether the driver with the right-of-way exercised reasonable care to avoid the accident (see e.g. Nevarez v S.R.M. Mgt. Corp., 58 AD3d 295, 298 [1st Dept 2008]).

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Saxe, Kapnick and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ampofo v. Brydson, 2016 NY Slip Op 8023, 144 A.D.3d 611, 41 N.Y.S.3d 424 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

2016 NY Slip Op 8023 (Ampofo v. Brydson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodriguez v. Commodore Maintenance Corp.
2025 NY Slip Op 30126(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)
Cordero v. Kacinskis
2023 NY Slip Op 00809 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)