Amplicon, Inc. v. Director, New Jersey Division of Taxation

19 N.J. Tax 45
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided March 10, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from a Tax Court order dismissing its complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, R. 4:6—2(a), appellant Amplicon, Inc., contends that the Court misinterpreted and improperly applied statutory provisions respecting refund of sales and use tax payments. It contends, too, that equitable principles should have been applied to toll statutory limitation periods enabling it to request relief from asserted sales tax overpayments made following an audit conducted under the authority of respondent, the Director, New Jersey Division of Taxation.

[46] Upon review of the record and consideration of the briefs and oral arguments, we are satisfied that the order under review should be affirmed, substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Small in his comprehensive .written opinion dated September 18, 1998, as supplemented, following our limited remand, by his letter opinion of March 11,1999.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amplicon, Inc. v. Director, New Jersey Division of Taxation, 19 N.J. Tax 45 (N.J. Ct. App. 2000).

19 N.J. Tax 45 (Amplicon, Inc. v. Director, New Jersey Division of Taxation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

125 Monitor Street LLC v. Jersey City
21 N.J. Tax 232 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2004)