Ampleman v. Turner

341 S.W.3d 161, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 576, 2011 WL 1565131
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 26, 2011·No. ED 95758·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Ampleman (Appellant) appeals, pro se, from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County granting summary judgment in favor St. Charles County Police Officer Christopher Kegley. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in determining that Officer Kegley was entitled to qualified immunity.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of Officer Kegley. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ampleman v. Turner, 341 S.W.3d 161, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 576, 2011 WL 1565131 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

341 S.W.3d 161 (Ampleman v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Williams
341 S.W.3d 161 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)