Ampleman v. Turner

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ampleman v. Turner

341 S.W.3d 161, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 576, 2011 WL 1565131

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 26, 2011

DocketED 95758

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 341 S.W.3d 161 (Ampleman v. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ampleman v. Turner, 341 S.W.3d 161, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 576, 2011 WL 1565131 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Ampleman (Appellant) appeals, pro se, from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County granting summary judgment in favor St. Charles County Police Officer Christopher Kegley. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in determining that Officer Kegley was entitled to qualified immunity.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of Officer Kegley. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI