Ampleman v. Schweiss

Eighth Circuit

Ampleman v. Schweiss

3 F. App'x 582

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 27, 2001

DocketNo. 00-2292

StatusPublished

This text of 3 F. App'x 582 (Ampleman v. Schweiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ampleman v. Schweiss, 3 F. App'x 582 (8th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John and Noel Ampleman appeal the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in their action alleging due process violations, abuse of process, and malicious prosecution. After de novo review, see Schuver v. MidAm. Energy Co., 154 F.3d 795, 799 (8th Cir.1998), we agree with the district court, for the reasons explained in its order, that the Amplemans’ action was time-barred.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

John and Noel Ampleman appeal the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in their action alleging due process violations, abuse of process, and malicious prosecution. After de novo review, see Schuver v. MidAm. Energy Co., 154 F.3d 795, 799 (8th Cir.1998), we agree with the district court, for the reasons explained in its order, that the Amplemans’ action was time-barred.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 F. App'x 582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ampleman-v-schweiss-ca8-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack