Ampleman v. Schweiss

Eighth Circuit

Ampleman v. Schweiss

3 F. App'x 582

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2001·No. No. 00-2292·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John and Noel Ampleman appeal the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in their action alleging due process violations, abuse of process, and malicious prosecution. After de novo review, see Schuver v. MidAm. Energy Co., 154 F.3d 795, 799 (8th Cir.1998), we agree with the district court, for the reasons explained in its order, that the Amplemans’ action was time-barred.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

John and Noel Ampleman appeal the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in their action alleging due process violations, abuse of process, and malicious prosecution. After de novo review, see Schuver v. MidAm. Energy Co., 154 F.3d 795, 799 (8th Cir.1998), we agree with the district court, for the reasons explained in its order, that the Amplemans’ action was time-barred.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Ampleman v. Schweiss, 3 F. App'x 582 (8th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

3 F. App'x 582 (Ampleman v. Schweiss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related